So if you can afford it the advanced is very good. The plugins that are great for me are the Visual Mixer as it leaves all the panning in front of you like a movable picture and the Tonal Balance which compares ur song with the industry norm and you can see where it may not be balanced and then work to correct the imbalance.Also if I am not sure a track needs nuetron I can use a Mix Tap on the track which allows all the communication between plugins still to go on. I have Ozone 8 and N2 and I love them I have to say. I suggest watching the videos on their website and see if this is something you may or not need. The Track assistant in Neutron and Mastering assistant In Ozone are really good at analysis and can either suggest of automatically set all of the parameters of the module's.Įach program has there own use and I have no regrets buying both of them. Quite slick actually.Īlso as mentioned the advanced versions allow the individual plugins to be put on a track instead of the whole Neutron or Ozone which is quite a load on the CPU if you use these on every track and have lots of tracks. This allows the Tonal Balance plugin to adjust any EQ settings on any track that has an instance of a Neutron or Ozone EQ on it.
The advanced versions include the Tonal Balance Control plugin and can communicate with all the EQ plugins from Ozone and Neutron directly. Like Bud said Ozone is used most for the mastering where Neutron is used mostly at the track level. Is it better to use both Ozone and Neutron together or should I just get Ozone for now? Is there a huge difference between standard and advanced verions of ozone and what they can do?Ģ.